In United States v. Edwards, 2011 BCCA 100, [2011] B.C.J. No. 374, the accused likewise sought to lead exculpatory evidence to place a different or diminished emphasis on the appellant’s role in the fraudulent telemarketing scheme which founded the request for extradition in that case. This Court affirmed the extradition judge’s conclusion that the excluded evidence was not relevant to the committal test under s. 29(1).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.