What is the disclosure required on an ex parte application?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Key Insurance Services Partnership v. T. Clarke Insurance Services Ltd., 2010 BCSC 1857 (CanLII):
The ambit of the disclosure generally required on an ex parte application was reviewed and summarized in Evans v. Umbrella Capital LLC, 2004 BCCA 149 where Mr. Justice Donald, for the court, said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a failure to meet the disclosure obligation on an ex parte application sufficient to bar the applicant from seeking the same injunctive relief? (British Columbia, Canada)
When bringing an ex parte application, can the applicant make full and frank disclosure of all material facts? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a receivership application, is the receiver required to make a full and complete disclosure of the receivership's assets? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the financial disclosure required for an interim application for support? (British Columbia, Canada)
In determining whether to grant a Rule 18A trial on part of a trust application, what is the risk that the findings of the application may be carried over to the subsequent determination of other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a developer exempt from strict disclosure requirements under the Financial Information Complaints Commission (FICOM) even if the developer has made significant changes to the disclosure rules? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required on an application to vary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the result of an application for disclosure of the solicitor's file in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an alternative argument that the application of a law of general application to a particular group of Indians in a particular activity is legislation in their Indian-ness? (British Columbia, Canada)
