In assessing the evidence, the defendants rely on the language in Golden v. Howard (2009), 49 E.T.R. (3d) 107, [2009] O.J. No. 2266 (per G.B. Smith J.) at para. 26: “Evidence to either support or rebut a resulting trust is relevant and admissible if it concerns the intention of the settler at the date of the transfer. Evidence before or after the fact is not relevant nor is it relevant that a settler later attempted to retract from his or her gift.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.