When is evidence of malice, animosity or murderous intent relevant to a charge of second-degree murder?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from HMTQ v. Dupras, 2000 BCSC 1128 (CanLII):

Evidence of an expression of malice, animosity or murderous intent on a previous occasion was clearly relevant to a charge of second-degree murder (Regina v. Truong (2000), (B.C.C.A.) 116). However, when weighing its probative value against its prejudicial effect, such evidence had to be placed in context.

Other Questions


What is the relevant evidence relevant to whether a murder was planned and deliberate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant evidence to support a claim that a transferor's intention was not to transfer at the time of the transfer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant relevance and effect factor for admitting expert evidence at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can evidence of fraudulent intent and fraudulent intent impeach a transfer for good consideration? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some types of evidence that may be relevant to determining the intent of a transferor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for producing and tender all relevant evidence in proper reply evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada when it comes to rationalizing the subjective evidence of the parties' intentions with objective evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is intent relevant to the meaning of the words "intention" in the context of a contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a judge's failure to consider relevant evidence relevant to the issue of inter vivos gifts an error of law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the types of evidence relevant to determining the intention of the transferor? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.