Can evidence of fraudulent intent and fraudulent intent impeach a transfer for good consideration?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bailie v. Bailie, 2010 BCSC 946 (CanLII):

Even where a transfer is for good consideration, evidence of fraudulent intent on the part of the transferor and transferee will impeach the transfer despite good consideration: LKB v. GJT, [1997] B.C.J. No. 348 (S.C.) at para. 30.

Other Questions


What is the impact of a transferor's intent to transfer a player when the transferor intended to transfer the player at the time of the transfer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant evidence to support a claim that a transferor's intention was not to transfer at the time of the transfer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a transfer be a gift when the transferor intended to transfer the transfer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What evidence is required to prove the intention of a transferor at the time of the transfer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can evidence of intention that arises subsequent to a transfer be excluded if it does not comply with the Cartright rule? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada when it comes to rationalizing the subjective evidence of the parties' intentions with objective evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a transfer when determining fraudulent intention? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of evidence used to prove the intention of a party to a transferor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for malicious intent in the context of an appeal against the findings of a finding of malicious intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.