Double costs are awarded as a punitive measure against a party for failing to accept an offer to settle which, under the circumstances, should have been accepted. The court must consider whether, during the time it was open for acceptance, it would have been reasonable for it to have been accepted considering whether it had ‘some relationship to the claim, whether it could be easily evaluated, and whether some rationale for the offer was provided: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.