Does the trial court abuse its discretion in admitting photographs and the subject testimony?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Thompson, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 15, 7 Cal.App.4th 1966 (Cal. App. 1992):
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim photographs and the subject testimony. (See People v. Hardy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 86, 199-200, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 796, 825 P.2d 781; People v. Sanders (1990) 51 Cal.3d 471, 514, 273 Cal.Rptr. 537, 797 P.2d 561; People v. Carrera (1989) 49 Cal.3d 291, 329, 261 Cal.Rptr. 348, 777 P.2d 121.)
4. Appellant contends the trial court failed to exercise sentencing discretion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a defendant be able to argue that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about two prior convictions subject to the conditions the court imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that a jury found that an employee of an airport subjected him to an adverse employment action is sufficient to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in denying him a motion for a new trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion in admitting photographs of a murder victim? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence reviewable for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied a defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Page 35 of the Defendant's lawyer as more prejudicial than probative? (California, United States of America)
