California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lorenzana, A145584 (Cal. App. 2017):
The parties' briefs ignore these recent developments and do not address whether the sex offenses, criminal threats, and assault comprised a single completed actus reus for the purposes of the section 654 analysis. We therefore limit our discussion to whether substantial evidence in the record supports the conclusion that defendant "harbored 'multiple criminal objectives,' which were independent of and not merely incidental to each other," such that "he may be punished for each statutory violation committed in pursuit of each objective, 'even though the violations shared common acts or were parts
Page 16
of an otherwise indivisible course of conduct.' " (People v. Harrison, supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 335.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.