The following excerpt is from Manning v. F.A.A., 112 F.3d 516 (9th Cir. 1997):
Manning's contention that the revocation violated the Double Jeopardy Clause lacks merit because the revocation was a remedial sanction, not a criminal sanction. See id. at 1288; United States v. Ursery, 116 S.Ct. 2135, 2142 (1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.