The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Hicks, 145 F.3d 1342 (9th Cir. 1998):
Hicks also contends that the admission of prior convictions at trial violated the double jeopardy clause. This contention lacks merit because the double jeopardy clause does not prohibit the admission of evidence. See United States v. Govro, 833 F.2d 135, 136 (9th Cir.1987) (stating generally that the double jeopardy clause bars retrial of the same offense).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.