The following excerpt is from WildEarth Guardians v. Provencio, 918 F.3d 620 (9th Cir. 2019):
As for the regional office's skepticism regarding the scope of retrieval permitted under the plans, "the fact that a preliminary determination by a local agency representative is later overruled at a higher level within the agency does not render the decisionmaking process arbitrary and capricious," as agencies are "fully entitled" to "change[] their minds . . . as long as the proper procedures were followed." Nat'l Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 659, 127 S.Ct. 2518, 168 L.Ed.2d 467 (2007). Such
[918 F.3d 631]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.