California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sethi, B286349 (Cal. App. 2019):
12. The trial court concluded defendant's Miranda argument was meritless because Miranda's exclusionary rule does not apply to probation revocation hearings (People v. Racklin (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 872). The court further found, in any event, that defendant was not in custody at the time he made the challenged statement. Defendant does not challenge the court's Miranda ruling on appeal.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.