The following excerpt is from United States v. Thompson, 728 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2013):
7. The majority also errs by applying the rule of lenity to 18 U.S.C. 844(h)(1). Application of the rule of lenity is appropriate only when there remains a grievous ambiguity in the language of the statute after a court has used every method of statutory construction to resolve it. United States v. Wildes, 120 F.3d 468, 471 (4th Cir.1997). Section 844(h)(1) is devoid of any ambiguity, grievous or otherwise.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.