Does the government need to prove the identities of five supervised persons to establish that they are part of a continuing criminal enterprise?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Harris, 209 F.3d 156 (2nd Cir. 1999):
These cases establish that even at trial, the government need not prove the identities of the five persons supervised in order to establish that element of a continuing criminal enterprise. A fortiori there need not be proof of those identities before the court may properly accept a plea of guilty. Thus, in Fama v. United States, 901 F.2d 1175 (2d Cir. 1990), this
Page 161
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the government's argument in support of its contention that the federal government does not have the authority to compel pretrial disclosure of the identity of government witnesses? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the criminal activity committed by John Kubick, the former director of an investment bank, was a criminal enterprise that resulted in his own criminal conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the participation of an undercover federal agent in a criminal enterprise in the criminal enterprise bar appellant from a conviction under the due process clause? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal test for establishing that a person who misused a government email address is responsible for the theft of government materials from a third party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a minor criminal offence included in the criminal history of a defendant in the Criminal History of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is clear established Federal law governing the meaning of the word "clearly established federal law"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When counting criminal convictions for career offender purposes under section 4A1.2 of the Criminal Code, is the criminal conviction of a career offender included in the criminal record calculation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a person who receives unemployment insurance benefits and continues to work, without remuneration, after her termination of employment, entitled to continue to receive benefits? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is evidence of a person's membership in or association with a criminal enterprise circumstantial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the implications of Section 3 of the Criminal Code for First Amendment rights of a person on supervised release? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
