The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Valdez, 990 F.2d 1265 (9th Cir. 1993):
Valdez contends that he made incriminating statements while subject to custodial interrogation without being advised of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Valdez argues that he was told he could not leave the apartment and that the agents did not honor his request to speak with an attorney. This contention is without merit.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.