The following excerpt is from People v. Hendricks, 665 N.Y.S.2d 45, 90 N.Y.2d 956 (N.Y. 1997):
Defendant's reliance on Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 107 S.Ct. 828, 93 L.Ed.2d 920, is misplaced as defendant's refusal to give a written statement did not implicate his right to counsel (cf., Connecticut v. Barrett, supra [where defendant agreed to talk but refused to make a written statement without counsel, defendant's invocation of his right to counsel was limited to the making of written statements and oral statement was admissible] ).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.