The following excerpt is from Wang v. Holder, Agency No.A079-629-999, Agency No. A079-630-000, No. 07-72018 (9th Cir. 2011):
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to reopen the proceedings on the basis of lack of notice. The notice sent to the most recent address provided by petitioner was sufficient to satisfy the notice requirements of 8 U.S.C. 1229(a)(2)(A). See Popa v. Holder, 571 F.3d 890, 897-98 (9th Cir. 2009).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.