The following excerpt is from Sanders v. United States, 297 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1961):
Where, as here, it is apparent from the record that at the time of filing
[297 F.2d 737]
the first motion the movant knew the facts on which the second motion is based, yet in the second motion set forth no reason why he was previously unable to assert the new ground and did not allege that he had previously been unaware of the significance of the relevant facts, the district court, may, in its discretion, decline to entertain the second motion. Moore v. United States, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 278 F.2d 459.[297 F.2d 737]
Affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.