The following excerpt is from Jenkins, In re, 32 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 1994):
3. Jenkins asserts that the bankruptcy court was required to apply some special evidentiary standard which would construe evidence in his favor. He is incorrect. The proper standard is simply preponderance of the evidence. See Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 291, 111 S.Ct. 654, 661, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.