Does the 9th Circuit err in denying plaintiffs greater preliminary injunctive relief than it already issued?

In light of our precedents, the district court did not err in denying plaintiffs greater preliminary injunctive relief than it already issued. In the context of our review of the denial of a preliminary injunction, "[i]f the district court identifies the correct legal standard, it will not be reversed simply because the appellate court would have arrived at a different result if it had applied the law to the facts of the case." Doe v. Kelly, 878 F.3d 710, 719 (9th Cir. 2017) (quotations omitted). "Rather, the court only abuses its discretion when its application of the standard is illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences that may be drawn from the record." Id. (quotations omitted). That is not the case here.