California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cantrell, E064076 (Cal. App. 2016):
Cantrell compares himself to the defendant in People v. Mendoza, supra, 59 Cal.App.4th 1333who made a single statement to a victim and was convicted of both dissuading a witness ( 136.1) and criminal threats ( 422)where section 654 required a stay on the sentence for his conviction for criminal threats. (See People v. Mesa, supra, 54 Cal.4th at pp. 199-200.) The offenses here occurred on the same day but they were separate and distinct offenses with different intents and objectives.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.