The following excerpt is from United States v. Baldon, No. 18-10411 (9th Cir. 2020):
1226 (9th Cir. 2017) (emphasis added). This is necessary because "we must presume that the conviction rested upon [nothing] more than the least of th[e] acts criminalized." Moncrieffe v. Holder, 569 U.S. 184, 190-191 (2013). Here, the least of the acts criminalized, as shown by the jury instructions, is carjacking accomplished by fear of injury to property.9 Thus, section 215 is not a categorical match to the elements clause of 4B1.2(a).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.