California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People ex rel. Lungren v. Peron, 59 Cal.App.4th 1383, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 20 (Cal. App. 1997):
3 It is questionable whether this incorporation of the "requirements of [section] 11362.5" in the modifying order was "definite enough to provide a standard of conduct for those whose activities are proscribed, as well as a standard for the ascertainment of violations of the injunctive order by the courts called upon to apply it...." (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 644, 651, 83 Cal.Rptr. 35.) This case turned on what conduct section 11362.5 did permit. That conduct remained vague or undefined by the trial court's modifying order.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.