California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mincey, 2 Cal.4th 408, 6 Cal.Rptr.2d 822, 827 P.2d 388 (Cal. 1992):
When considered as a whole and when considered with the jury's findings, there is no reasonable probability that the instructions misled the jury. (People v. Duncan (1991) 53 Cal.3d 955, 972-973, 281 Cal.Rptr. 273, 810 P.2d 131.)
The improper instruction related to the offense of murder, but not its degree. The jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder based on instructions that required it to find premeditation and deliberation or torture murder, or both. In addition, the special circumstance verdict required a jury finding of intent to kill. The jury's first degree murder verdict and its special circumstance finding establish that the jury did not base its conviction on the felony-murder theory. (See People v. Morris (1988) 46 Cal.3d 1, 24, 249 Cal.Rptr. 119, 756 P.2d 843.)
Page 849
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.