Does Counsel have an obligation to make a fact-specific analysis of the evidence to explain its basis for finding each offense was committed on a separate occasion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wright, C072781 (Cal. App. 2015):
As we concluded in part VIII, ante, the trial court had no obligation to make a fact-specific analysis of the evidence to explain its basis for finding each offense was committed on a separate occasion. Counsel does not render ineffective assistance by failing to make a nonmeritorious objection. (People v. Memro (1995) 11 Cal.4th 786, 874, overruled on another ground in People v. Gaines (2009) 46 Cal.4th 172, 181, fn. 2.)
Page 43
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
When a trial judge has found under Pen. Code 667.6, subdivision (d), that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions, that they were committed at the same time, can the judge reverse? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversing a finding that a defendant committed offenses on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant find fault in the finding that he was not armed when he committed his felon-in-possession offense? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for overturning a substantial evidence finding on the basis of circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
