California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Johnson v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty., C073091 (Cal. App. 2014):
Defendant also finds fault in the trial court's conclusion that he was armed when he committed his felon-in-possession offense because there was conflicting evidence. Conflicting evidence, however, does not cast doubt on the trial court's factual findings because we review factual findings for substantial evidence. (People v. Johnson (1980) 26 Cal.3d 557, 578.) Here, there was substantial evidence that defendant was armed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.