The following excerpt is from United States v. Johnson, 15-2367-cr (2nd Cir. 2016):
sources of information"); Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 243 (1983) (agent's independent corroboration contributed to legitimate belief that informant's information was true).
Second, there was no error in the district court's decision to credit the agents' testimony that they did not search the stash house or seize any evidence therein until after they obtained a search warrant. A district court's evaluation of a testifying agent's credibility is entitled to "special deference." United States v. Lucky, 569 F.3d 101, 106 (2d Cir. 2009).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.