Does a state court have the power to determine whether real property is within its boundaries or is in a neighboring state?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from River Farms, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino County, 252 Cal.App.2d 604, 60 Cal.Rptr. 665 (Cal. App. 1967):
A state court has the power to determine, as between private contestants, the disputed question whether real property is within its boundaries or is in a neighboring state, where the fact depended upon the effect of the shift of the course of the boundary river. (Durfee v. Duke, 375 U.S. 106, 84 S.Ct. 242, 11 L.Ed.2d 186.)
Section 1060, Code of Civil Procedure, provides:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's intent or mental state is a factor in determining whether they intended to commit an act of violence? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to re-weigh the evidence to determine whether the trial court abused its power to grant an order for an abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
Is Section 1714.10 of the California Code of Civil Procedure sufficient to determine whether pleading falls within the coverage of the statute or within one of its stated exceptions? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's mental state was not a factor in determining whether they had committed a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the court considered all relevant factors in determining a plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
