The following excerpt is from U.S. v. LaFromboise, 105 F.3d 512 (9th Cir. 1997):
LaFromboise next argues the district court violated the double jeopardy clause by ordering his sentence for the section 5861(d) offense, imposed in the present case, to run consecutively with his sentence for the section 924(c)(1) offense, imposed in the separate drug case. We review de novo the legality of a sentence. United States v. Stafford, 831 F.2d 1479, 1480 (9th Cir.1987). The consecutive sentence does not violate the double jeopardy clause.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.