Does a prosecutor who makes a closing argument that a defendant's previous drug-related felony convictions would assist the jury in determining credibility?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Boyette, 127 Cal.Rptr.2d 544, 29 Cal.4th 381, 58 P.3d 391 (Cal. 2002):

Defendant cites three instances in which he claims the prosecutor committed this type of misconduct. First, the prosecutor stated in closing argument that defendant's two prior drugrelated felony convictions would assist the jury in determining defendant's credibility, and that "if he were to-somehow, God forbid take the stand and say he was sorry, which you didn't see." Defense counsel immediately objected, citing Griffin, supra, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106, but his objection was overruled, apparently on the ground that defendant had testified at the guilt phase. The trial court erred by overruling defendant's objection, as he did not testify at the penalty phase, the phase of trial in which he might express remorse and to which the prosecutor apparently was referring. The prosecutor's argument thus ran afoul of the rule prohibiting her from urging that a defendant should have testified at the penalty phase to express remorse. (People v. Crittenden, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 147, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 474, 885 P.2d 887.)

Other Questions


Can a defendant petition the court that entered a judgment of conviction to recall a conviction for a felony conviction that would have been a misdemeanor under section 1170.18 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a felonies conviction under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code, who would have been convicted of a misdemeanor under this act if this act had not been in effect? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1170.15 of the California Criminal Code apply when a defendant is convicted of a felony (the first felony) and also convicted of dissuading or attempting to dissuade a victim of the first felony? (California, United States of America)
Does the prosecutor's closing argument misstate the law in stating that, to convict, the jury need only determine that the injury was suffered? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable likelihood that a prosecutor's comment at the closing argument was directed solely at the persuasive force of defense counsel's closing argument? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence and therefore must proceed further to determine the conduct underlying the conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant punished under section 667, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code because he was convicted of having committed a new serious felony after suffering a prior serious felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
What authority does a defendant have to make an election to determine whether a defendant should be charged with making terrorist threats? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal his conviction for false imprisonment against a defendant who was previously convicted of kidnapping? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.