Does a prosecutor improperly comment on a defendant's right not to testify?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mitchell, B281809 (Cal. App. 2018):

Defendants argue that the prosecutor improperly commented on their right not to testify, thereby running afoul of Griffin v. California (1965) 380 U.S. 609. We independently review claims of Griffin error. (People v. Clair (1992) 2 Cal.4th 629, 663.)

Other Questions


Is a defendant entitled to damages if the prosecutor improperly commented upon defendant's failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have a right to comment on a defendant's exercise of privilege not to testify? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor make an improper comment on appellant's assertion of his Fifth Amendment right not to testify? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment to the jury that a defendant who refused to testify at trial about his failure to testify prejudicial error harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comment on defendant's right not to testify constitute harmless error? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comment that a defendant has an absolute constitutional right not to testify affect the outcome of his trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a claim against the prosecutor for improper comment on his failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comments about sexual assault violate a defendant's federal and state constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor comment on a defendant's decision not to testify? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment to the jury improper or improper? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.