Does a prosecutor's comment on defendant's right not to testify constitute harmless error?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Waterman, G049909 (Cal. App. 2014):

In any event, the prosecutor's remarks on defendant's right not to testify were brief, mild, and not the type of comments Griffin declared invalid. "[I]ndirect, brief and mild references to a defendant's failure to testify, without any suggestion that an inference of guilt be drawn therefrom, are uniformly held to constitute harmless error." (People v. Hovey (1988) 44 Cal.3d 543, 572; People v. Turner (2004) 34 Cal.4th 406, 420-421.) Although the prosecutor's comments were probably ill advised, inviting scrutiny on appeal, it was not error to paraphrase the court's own instruction, and, in any

Page 14

Other Questions


When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment to the jury that a defendant who refused to testify at trial about his failure to testify prejudicial error harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comment that a defendant has an absolute constitutional right not to testify affect the outcome of his trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who referred to a defendant's failure to testify and lack of remorse constitute a criminal error? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to testify at the penalty phase an error not to instruct the jury to refrain from drawing any inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to damages if the prosecutor improperly commented upon defendant's failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comments about sexual assault violate a defendant's federal and state constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.