Does a prosecutor cross-examining defendant's cross-examination of him violate the definition of a defendant's privilege?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Payne, C069583 (Cal. App. 2014):
On appeal, defendant contends the prosecutor's cross-examination of him violated Doyle v. Ohio (1976) 426 U.S. 610 [49 L.Ed.2d 91] (Doyle).
We affirm.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have standing to complain about a violation of Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have standing to complain of a violation of third party's privilege against self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a claim that a prosecutor made improper racial references in the prosecutor's guilt phase argument to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor improperly comment on a defendant's silence in their closing argument violate the Fifth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to damages if the prosecutor improperly commented upon defendant's failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comments about sexual assault violate a defendant's federal and state constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comment on a defendant's silence violate the Fifth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
