The following excerpt is from Thornton v. Virk, Case No. 1:15-cv-01782-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. 2017):
Whether an action was dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim turns on an evaluation of the dismissal order. Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1121 (9th Cir. 2005) ("prior dismissals would qualify as strikes only if, after reviewing the orders dismissing those actions and other relevant information, the district court determined that they had been dismissed because they were frivolous, malicious or failed to state a claim."). An
Page 3
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.