California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty. (In re S. Cal. Gas Leak Cases), 18 Cal.App.5th 581, 227 Cal.Rptr.3d 117 (Cal. App. 2017):
Counsel for business plaintiffs confirmed at oral argument they do not seek leave to further amend their pleading. ( Centinela, supra, 1 Cal.5th at p. 1010, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 280, 382 P.3d 1116.) This position tacitly acknowledges the complaint does not suffer from a deficiency that can be cured by amendment, but is, instead, ripe for writ review: "Where, as here, the pleadings and matters subject to judicial notice establish the defendant owed the plaintiff no duty, a case may properly be disposed of on demurrer, without further waste of judicial resources." ( Avila v. Citrus Community College Dist. (2006) 38 Cal.4th 148, 165, fn. 12, 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 299, 131 P.3d 383.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.