California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of L.A., 202 Cal.Rptr.3d 414, 247 Cal.App.4th 953 (Cal. App. 2016):
may affirm on any ground supported by the record regardless of whether the trial court relied upon it. (Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 167, 201, 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 490, 65 P.3d 1255.) In deciding whether a plaintiff whose complaint is barred should be granted further leave to amend, we ask whether there is a reasonable possibility that the defect can be cured by amendment; if so, the trial court has abused its discretion in denying leave to amend and we must reverse. (Zelig v. County of Los Angeles (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1112, 1126, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171 (Zelig ).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.