California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Coughlin v. Owens-Illinois, Inc, 21 Cal.App.4th 572, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 214 (Cal. App. 1993):
A similar argument was rejected by an Illinois appellate court in Fetzer v. Wood (1991) 211 Ill.App.3d 70, 155 Ill.Dec. 626, 569 N.E.2d 1237. There, the court had to determine whether the plaintiff's medical malpractice action based on a latent injury "accrued" before the effective date of a statute modifying Illinois' comparative fault doctrine. (Id., 155 Ill.Dec. at 629, 569 N.E.2d at p. 1240.) The defendants argued that "where the time of injury is not readily ascertainable, the only other basis for determining when a cause of action accrues is when it may be 'discovered.' " (Id., 155 Ill.Dec. at 632, 569 N.E.2d at p. 1243.) There, as here, the defendants relied on statute of limitations cases involving latent injuries. In rejecting this argument, the Illinois court noted that the defendants
Page 229
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.