Does a minor have a right to counsel in a juvenile court proceeding?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Garth D., In re, 127 Cal.Rptr. 881, 55 Cal.App.3d 986 (Cal. App. 1976):

2 The right to counsel, the privilege against self-incrimination and other rights subsumed under the concept of 'due process' of law are applicable to minors in juvenile court proceedings. (Application of Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527; cf. Haley v. State of Ohio, 332 U.S. 596, 68 S.Ct. 302, 92 L.Ed. 224.)

3 Welfare and Institutions Code section 627 provides in pertinent part:

Other Questions


Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
Does submitting on a social worker's recommendation to the juvenile court waive a parent's right to challenge a juvenile court decision accepting the recommendation? (California, United States of America)
Can an adult who is alleged to have committed an offence as a juvenile waive the right to proceed in juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for joint physical custody of a minor, is the mother's claim that the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying her request for joint custody of the minor? (California, United States of America)
When will a minor who violates the criminal law be prosecuted in the juvenile court rather than the criminal court? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court's evidentiary ruling that a minor is not a violation of her constitutional rights or an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Can a court's frustration and irritation at counsel's repeated efforts to violate evidentiary rules be viewed as "friction between court and counsel"? (California, United States of America)
When questioning a minor suspect for the purposes of his right to counsel after the initial interrogation is over, can the minor continue to speak to the police officer? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.