The following excerpt is from Langston v. Shiaishi, No. CIV S-11-1624 DAD P (E.D. Cal. 2012):
The court is required to determine whether, in this 1983 action for damages, a judgment in plaintiff's favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Here, the court is unable to make that determination because the allegations of plaintiff's complaint are too vague and conclusory. Therefore, the court will dismiss the complaint and grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.
Page 4
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.