The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Robinson, 101 F.3d 688 (2nd Cir. 1996):
Pollak now argues that the district court's instruction to the jury regarding his stipulation "was defective because it charged elements of the offense, and then removed them, needlessly confusing the jury." We disagree.
In United States v. Figueroa, 618 F.2d 934 (2d Cir.1980), we held that:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.