Does a federal court need to require corroboration of an accomplice's testimony to convict a defendant?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from McCullough v. United States, 403 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir. 1968):
We have repeatedly refused to change our long held rule that the federal courts, unlike some state courts, do not require the corroboration of an accomplice's testimony implicating a defendant. White v. United States, 315 F.2d 113, 115 (9th Cir. 1963), and cases cited therein.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal court to grant relief to a convicted criminal defendant who has been convicted and sentenced in a federal civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the requirements of a federal district court under section 851(b) of the Criminal Code to notify a defendant of their prior conviction before sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Are there any cases where the Supreme Court has found that criminal convictions for common law crimes against individuals who have not been convicted of criminal convictions are sufficient grounds for criminal convictions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court order that a defendant be held in contempt of court for failing to comply with a federal contempt order? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have more latitude than a federal court to reasonably determine that a defendant has not satisfied the standard of conduct required for a motion to be heard in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
