Does a father's home need to be settled to satisfy the statutory requirement that the father's place of habitation be settled?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Richard M., In re, 122 Cal.Rptr. 531, 14 Cal.3d 783, 537 P.2d 363 (Cal. 1975):
8 At least one court has held that the father's place of habitation need not be 'settled' in order to satisfy the statutory requirement. (See Hurst v. Hurst (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 859, 870, 39 Cal.Rptr. 162.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a requirement that third time offenders placed on probation "be confined in county jail" need to be satisfied by placement in a functional equivalent of an alcohol rehabilitation facility? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have a claim that is insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirements of a claim? (California, United States of America)
Is a timely objection required to preserve a claim of error for failing to comply with a statutory procedural requirement? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and the test required by the Sixth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant manipulate the rule of rule 31(d) to bypass the statutory certificate requirement under section 1237.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts found that section 647, subdivision (a) of the California Penal Code prohibits the solicitation of lewd or dissolute conduct in any public place or in any place open to public view? (California, United States of America)
Does international law prohibit a sentence of death rendered in accordance with state and federal constitutional and statutory requirements? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have to satisfy the requirements of section 654 of the California Criminal Code by sentencing a defendant to time served on a charge of assault with intent to rape? (California, United States of America)
Does a tangible asset or concrete gain need to be present to satisfy the requirement that the action confer a significant benefit? (California, United States of America)
Is a Local Rule that seeks to relax statutory requirements in section 664.6.4 of the California Constitution valid? (California, United States of America)
