Does a failure to object at sentencing to statements contained in a presentence report bar collateral relief?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Schanning, 922 F.2d 845 (9th Cir. 1990):
Schanning's motion was properly denied by the district court. United States v. Keller, 902 F.2d 1391, 1393 (9th Cir.1990), holds that the failure to object at sentencing to statements contained in a presentence report bars collateral relief. Schanning failed to object. Collateral relief is therefore barred.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a sentencing judge to determine a sentence based on an incorrect portion of the presentence report? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the burden of proof in sentencing based on hearsay statements in the presentence report? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a failure of a sentencing judge to start the calculation of a sentence by considering the applicable sentencing Guidelines grounds for reversal for resentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a motion seeking declaratory relief contained in the same motion contain injunctive relief? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the presumption that a person who makes a statement of intent to injure another person be liable for damages if that statement contains two statements of intent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of appealing against a sentencing judge's sentencing in a case where the sentencing judge referred to a prior error in sentencing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the sentencing packaging doctrine apply to a case where both a new sentence and a revocation sentence were imposed at the conclusion of a single sentencing proceeding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to respond to a Defendant's statement stating that the material facts contained in that statement are to be admitted as a matter of law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a defendant's sentence reduced de novo because it was based on a sentencing range that was subsequently reduced by the sentencing commission? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a failure to raise at sentencing at sentencing render trial counsel ineffective? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
