The following excerpt is from Harbin v. Sessions, 860 F.3d 58 (2nd Cir. 2017):
a drug was not properly identified, they merely demonstrate that the government must show the defendant to have sold some substance that appears in the schedules. See People v. Montoya , 244 A.D.2d 510, 664 N.Y.S.2d 106, 107 (2d Dep't 1997) ("Consequently, the substance was inadmissible, rendering the evidence against the defendant legally insufficient to establish that he sold a controlled substance."). The cases do not show that each substance creates a separate crime.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.