The following excerpt is from Lopo v. Fischmann, 5 F.3d 537 (9th Cir. 1993):
In its order, the district court erroneously stated that "[n]o objections to the [magistrate judge's] Report and Recommendation have been filed herein." Even where no objections are filed, the district court has a duty to conduct a de novo review of the magistrate judge's conclusions of law. Barilla v. Ervin, 886 F.2d 1514, 1518 (9th Cir.1989).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.