What is the test for reviewing a decision by a district judge to reconsider an interlocutory order by another judge of the same court?

"We review for abuse of discretion a district judge's decision to reconsider an interlocutory order by another judge of the same court." Amarel v. Connell, 102 F.3d 1494, 1515 (9th Cir. 1997).

We have held that:

While courts have some discretion not to apply the doctrine of law of the case, that discretion is limited. The prior decision should be followed unless: (1) the decision is clearly erroneous and its enforcement would work a manifest injustice, (2) intervening controlling authority makes reconsideration appropriate, or (3) substantially different evidence was adduced at a subsequent trial.

Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1489 (9th Cir. 1997) (citations, footnotes, and internal quotation marks omitted).