The following excerpt is from Bruce v. Chaiken, No. 2: 15-cv-0960 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. 2018):
Defendants also argue that plaintiff's delay in receipt of treatment did not cause substantial harm. As discussed above, a delay in treatment that does not cause substantial harm does not constitute an Eighth Amendment violation. Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335 (9th Cir. 1990).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.