California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Stanfield, B260318 (Cal. App. 2015):
Defendant does not argue that the issue of his intent was subject to a "pleading and proof" requirement, yet his contention is similar to such claims, which have been rejected by the appellate courts. (See People v. Chubbuck, supra, 231 Cal.App.4th at pp. 745, and cases cited therein.) As for defendant's complaint that the court made an "independent" finding, the Act does not require a jury finding to establish the exceptions to allowing resentencing of a prisoner, as is stated in many of these same cases. (See People v. Brimmer (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 782, 805, and cases cited therein.) The statute provides
Page 8
that the court must determine whether the exceptions in section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(2)(C)(iii) apply.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.