The following excerpt is from Johnson v. Dickinson, No. CIV S-10-1841 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. 2011):
years. Id. The court dismissed petitioner's challenge as barred by the statute of limitations, and as failing to state a cognizable constitutional claim. Mot., Ex. 2 (May 14, 2010 Order). The district court's dismissal of the earlier filed petition constitutes a decision on the merits. McNabb v. Yates, 576 F.3d 1028, 1029 (9th Cir. 2009) ("[D]ismissal of a habeas petition as untimely constitutes a disposition on the merits and . . . a further petition challenging the same conviction [is] 'second or successive' for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b).").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.