The following excerpt is from Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661 (9th Cir. 2018):
We review a district court's dismissal of a habeas petition as second or successive de novo. Wentzell v. Neven , 674 F.3d 1124, 1126 (9th Cir. 2012). Our review of an application to file a second or successive habeas petition is governed by the standard set forth in AEDPA, as is our determination of whether a second-in-time
[889 F.3d 667]
habeas petition is second or successive under AEDPA. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) (b)(3).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.